Topic summary
69% 86 analyzed articles/videos 36,173 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 28,890 hits . Analysis detected 218,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 186,260 analyzed words across 85 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 29% (10,799 of 15,144 topics). This White House is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. White House
Topic details
Total words: 186,260
Article count: 85
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score85 analyzed articles186.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst