Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cat Zakrzewski results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 642 hits . Analysis detected 2,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,004 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (853 of 6,138 authors). This Cat Zakrzewski is worse (more manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group. Cat Zakrzewski
Author details
Total words: 2,004
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.1% percentile 5.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.9% 23.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 11.5% 11.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.0% 14.0% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 32.0% 32.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 32.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 11.5%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Primacy Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst