Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cat Zakrzewski results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 642 hits. Analysis detected 2,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,004 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (853 of 6,138 authors). This Cat Zakrzewski is worse (more manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Cat Zakrzewski
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
87%Cat Zakrzewski (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,004
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510086.1% percentile
5.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 23.9%23.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.0%14.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 32.0%32.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.6%5.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 32.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 11.5%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Primacy Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate