Author summary
0% 11 analyzed articles/videos 2,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Allison results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 1,787 hits . Analysis detected 11,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,040 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,480 of 6,135 authors). This Natalie Allison is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Natalie Allison
Author details
Total words: 9,040
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score11 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.8% 19.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.7% 15.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst