Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 308 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen DeYoung results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 676 hits . Analysis detected 3,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,057 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 91% (610 of 6,162 authors). This Karen DeYoung is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. Karen DeYoung
Author details
Total words: 2,057
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.1% percentile 7.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.3% 28.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.0% 10.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.5% 11.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 32.9% 32.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 32.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 28.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 10.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.0%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 8.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst