Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Hudson results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 646 hits . Analysis detected 4,182 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,016 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,889 of 6,164 authors). This John Hudson is worse (more manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. John Hudson
Author details
Total words: 4,016
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.4% percentile 3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.1% 16.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.6% 11.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.0% 16.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst