Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Hudson results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 646 hits. Analysis detected 4,182 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,016 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,889 of 6,164 authors). This John Hudson is worse (more manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
John Hudson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
70%John Hudson (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,016
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

69% percentile
025507510069.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.1%16.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.6%11.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 16.0%16.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate