Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Warren P. Strobel results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 567 hits . Analysis detected 3,826 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,680 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,914 of 6,234 authors). This Warren P. Strobel is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Warren P. Strobel
Author details
Total words: 3,680
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.3% 11.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.4% 15.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst