Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Lamothe results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.4% saturation with 672 hits. Analysis detected 2,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,449 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of 97% (255 of 6,628 authors). This Dan Lamothe is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
Dan Lamothe
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
97%Dan Lamothe (selected)12%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,449
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

96% percentile
025507510096.2% percentile
11.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 33.4%33.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 24.0%24.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 46.4%46.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 31.8%31.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 3.7%3.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 46.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 33.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 31.8%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 24.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate