Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noah Robertson results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 889 hits . Analysis detected 4,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,126 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,161 of 6,628 authors). This Noah Robertson is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group. Noah Robertson
Author details
Total words: 3,126
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.5% percentile 4.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.3% 16.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.1% 15.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.4% 28.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 28.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 16.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst