Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Natanson results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Quote-first Misdirection , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 156 hits . Analysis detected 819 faulty-reasoning hits from 516 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.3% and a BS Rank of 96% (275 of 6,162 authors). This Hannah Natanson is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group. Hannah Natanson
Author details
Total words: 516
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.6% percentile 11.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles516 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 20.9% 20.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 30.2% 30.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.6% 12.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.4% 6.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.2% 7.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 19.2% 19.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 11.1% 11.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 30.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 26.2%, sitewide 26.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 20.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst