Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Natanson results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 819 faulty-reasoning hits from 516 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.3% and a BS Rank of 96% (275 of 6,162 authors). This Hannah Natanson is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Hannah Natanson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
96%Hannah Natanson (selected)12%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 516
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

96% percentile
025507510095.6% percentile
11.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles516 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 20.9%20.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 30.2%30.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.6%12.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.4%6.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.2%7.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 19.2%19.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 30.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 26.2%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 20.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 11.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate