Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Woodrow Cox results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 364 hits . Analysis detected 2,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,668 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,698 of 6,235 authors). This John Woodrow Cox is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. John Woodrow Cox
Author details
Total words: 2,668
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.8% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.6% 13.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 11.5%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst