Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liam Scott results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 552 faulty-reasoning hits from 676 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 89% (737 of 6,164 authors). This Liam Scott is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
Liam Scott
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
89%Liam Scott (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 676
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

88% percentile
025507510088.1% percentile
6.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles676 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 6.1%6.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.4%2.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate