Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Heim results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , In-Group Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 537 hits . Analysis detected 4,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,176 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,352 of 6,602 authors). This Joe Heim is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group. Joe Heim
Author details
Total words: 6,176
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst