Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video71 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana Hedgpeth results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 155 faulty-reasoning hits from 284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (397 of 6,258 authors). This Dana Hedgpeth is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Dana Hedgpeth
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠94%Dana Hedgpeth (selected)10%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 284
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.7% percentile
9.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles284 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 24.6%24.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 6.7%6.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 24.6%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos