Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Paquette results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 500 hits . Analysis detected 3,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,012 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,347 of 6,629 authors). This Danielle Paquette is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Danielle Paquette
Author details
Total words: 3,012
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.7% percentile 4.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 10.3% 10.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 10.3%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst