Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Boorstein results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 931 hits. Analysis detected 6,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,092 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,055 of 6,162 authors). This Michelle Boorstein is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Michelle Boorstein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
83%Michelle Boorstein (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,092
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510082.9% percentile
5.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 8.2%8.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.7%6.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.6%7.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.4%10.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.9%14.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 22.8%22.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 22.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate