Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maegan Vazquez results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 801 hits. Analysis detected 4,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,580 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,819 of 6,170 authors). This Maegan Vazquez is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Maegan Vazquez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
71%Maegan Vazquez (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,580
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510070.5% percentile
3.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.2%16.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.3%12.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 22.4%22.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 22.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate