Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maegan Vazquez results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 801 hits . Analysis detected 4,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,580 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,819 of 6,170 authors). This Maegan Vazquez is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Maegan Vazquez
Author details
Total words: 3,580
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.5% percentile 3.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.2% 16.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.3% 12.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 22.4% 22.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 22.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst