Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julian Mark results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 664 hits . Analysis detected 3,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,396 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,471 of 6,628 authors). This Julian Mark is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group. Julian Mark
Author details
Total words: 3,396
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.7% percentile 3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.6% 19.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst