Author summary
62% 2 analyzed articles/videos 778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean Rameswaram results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 582 hits . Analysis detected 5,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,820 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,223 of 6,171 authors). This Sean Rameswaram is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Sean Rameswaram
Author details
Total words: 5,820
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst