Author summary
53% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dustin DeSoto results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 913 hits . Analysis detected 7,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,226 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,251 of 6,196 authors). This Dustin DeSoto is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Dustin DeSoto
Author details
Total words: 9,226
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst