Publication summary
51% 89 analyzed articles/videos 76,881 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vox results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 45,347 hits . Analysis detected 434,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 505,664 analyzed words across 89 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 37% (256 of 400 publications). This Vox is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 505,664
Article count: 89
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score89 analyzed articles505.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 9.0% 9.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst