Author summary
â 55% 10 analyzed articles/videos 11,706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Millhiser results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 13,119 hits . Analysis detected 80,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 72,629 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of â 32% (4,263 of 6,244 authors). This Ian Millhiser is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Ian Millhiser
Author details
Total words: 72,629
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score10 analyzed articles72.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst