Author summary
53%8 analyzed articles/videos10,419 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zack Beauchamp results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 6,318 hits. Analysis detected 60,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 64,064 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (4,873 of 6,244 authors). This Zack Beauchamp is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Zack Beauchamp
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
22%Zack Beauchamp (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 64,064
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles64.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.9%9.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate