Author summary
41% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,934 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Herschander results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,503 hits . Analysis detected 14,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,582 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,715 of 6,628 authors). This Sara Herschander is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Sara Herschander
Author details
Total words: 15,582
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst