Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Vox results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,033 hits . Analysis detected 7,605 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Vox is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Vox
Author details
Total words: 9,780
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst