Author summary
45% 11 analyzed articles/videos 8,687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Prokop results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 5,197 hits . Analysis detected 47,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,143 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,130 of 6,348 authors). This Andrew Prokop is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group. Andrew Prokop
Author details
Total words: 54,143
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score11 analyzed articles54.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst