Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Swamp results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.7% saturation with 2,112 hits . Analysis detected 7,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,506 of 6,170 authors). This The Swamp is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. The Swamp
Author details
Total words: 6,276
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.4% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 33.6% 33.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 33.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst