Publication summary
86% 45 analyzed articles/videos 22,521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Daily Beast results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 20,433 hits . Analysis detected 129,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 102,800 analyzed words across 45 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (134 of 396 publications). This The Daily Beast is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 102,800
Article count: 45
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score45 analyzed articles102.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 11.2% 11.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 18.3% 18.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 19.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 18.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst