Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Daily Beast Podcast results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 1,429 hits . Analysis detected 9,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,780 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,663 of 6,254 authors). This The Daily Beast Podcast is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. The Daily Beast Podcast
Author details
Total words: 7,780
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.6% 11.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst