Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Daily Beast Podcast results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 1,429 hits. Analysis detected 9,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,780 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,663 of 6,254 authors). This The Daily Beast Podcast is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
The Daily Beast Podcast
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
58%The Daily Beast Podcast (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,780
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510057.4% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.6%11.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate