Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Ornedo results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 959 hits. Analysis detected 6,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,648 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,751 of 6,629 authors). This Julia Ornedo is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Julia Ornedo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
59%Julia Ornedo (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,648
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510058.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.3%6.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos