This Is What Trump’s Crazed Posts Are Really About: Political Guru 75%

By Vic Verbalaitis86% The Daily Beast Podcast0%

7/6/2026, 1:18:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.2% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 1,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 701 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66.8% and a BS Rank of 75% (5,553 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump’s obsession with spamming on social media is indicative of his fractured mental state, argues David Rothkopf. 
Appearing on The Daily Beast Podcast, the political expert explained that the 80-year-old president’s frequent posting sprees about his accomplishments are his way of affirming himself in the face of his insecurities. 
“Trump put out 67 posts on Truth Social—and we’ll go through some of them—but what, perhaps, is the most interesting is a list of all the things that he’s done that he thinks are, I guess, going to get him reelected,“ host Joanna Coles told Rothkopf. 
On Sunday, following the July Fourth festivities at his struggling state fair, Trump posted more than 100 times during the day, encompassing everything from random photos of his family members to attacks on a federal judge. 
Among his onslaught of posts was a list of 75 “accomplishments,” which he kicked off with a mention of his failed war on Iran. 
“The first one he started with was ‘Launched Operation Epic Fury, destroying Iran’s Navy’—the very thing that he said he wasn’t going to do, which is get involved in stupid stuff abroad,” Coles continued. 
“And then he goes, you know, ‘Secured the border, it’s down 99.999 percent, more than 3 million illegal aliens have left the United States under my leadership.’” 
“That’s such bulls--t,” Rothkopf interjected. 
Other “accomplishments” the president listed in his post, which were all written in the first person, involved his tariffs that were declared unlawful and his designation of fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction. 
“There’s too many to read, but what’s sort of fascinating is what he thinks is important and how he prioritized them, and he prioritizes it with Iran,” Coles added. 
“I mean, that’s one way to look at it,” the political guru replied. 
“To me, this is just neurotic.” 
“This is Trump sitting there going, ‘No, I’m a good president, I’m doing all these good things. 
Here’s a list of the good things in case you don’t remember them,’” Rothkopf said. 
“But almost every single one of them is based on a lie or a misinterpretation of the facts.” 
“This is the thing that is so striking,” he explained, “is that Trump thinks he is reaffirming, but he is actually undermining, because the facts don’t add up for him. 
And that is what is keeping him awake in the middle of the night, and is why he is sending these 67 things.” 
Reached for comment, White House spokesperson Davis Ingle shared a frequently recycled statement with the Daily Beast: “David Rothkopf is a far-left loser who clearly suffers from a severe and debilitating disease known as Trump Derangement Syndrome that has rotted his peanut-sized brain.” 
The Daily Beast has extensively chronicled the president’s frequent Truth Social rampages, including his record-breaking month of May in which he posted an average of 27 posts per day. 
“One thing I love—I’ve got to say—I love working with the Daily Beast. 
I love working with you," Rothkopf told Coles. 
“And one of the reasons is that the Daily Beast alone, among all the media outlets that I know in the whole world, is incapable of outrage overload. 
Every single thing that happens that is outrageous, you stay outraged.” 
“But The New York Times is bored with it. 
I mean, can you imagine The New York Times saying. 
‘Oh, there were 67 Truth Social posts?’” 
he added. 
“No. 
They don’t. 
Because this is boring. 
This is beneath them. 
But this man is going nuts, in real time, online, in front of everyone.” 
“To the rest of the world, you’ve got to say: Oh my god. 
This guy is the president of the United States, and he’s pumping out these crazy memes, and they’re all about racism and hate and his personal vendetta against a former president.” 
Rothkopf said. 
“It’s a sign of mental illness, right?” 
New episodes of The Daily Beast Podcast are released every Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday on YouTube, and on other podcast platforms the next morning. 
Follow our new feed on your favorite podcast platform at beast.pub/dailybeastpod and subscribe on YouTube to watch full episodes. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.3%Vic Verbalaitis: 2.3%The Daily Beast: 4.5%Confirmation Bias4.3%This article: 14.7%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.5%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Anchoring Bias14.7%This article: 18.1%Vic Verbalaitis: 3.8%The Daily Beast: 3.6%Availability Heuristic18.1%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.2%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.7%The Daily Beast: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias5.8%This article: 3.4%Vic Verbalaitis: 12.5%The Daily Beast: 11.2%Framing Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.4%The Daily Beast: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.8%The Daily Beast: 1.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.0%The Daily Beast: 1.3%Pessimism Bias3.3%This article: 45.2%Vic Verbalaitis: 24.4%The Daily Beast: 19.9%Negativity Bias45.2%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.3%The Daily Beast: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 20.5%Vic Verbalaitis: 6.0%The Daily Beast: 2.8%Fundamental Attribution Error20.5%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.8%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 3.2%The Daily Beast: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.8%The Daily Beast: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 4.0%The Daily Beast: 1.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.0%The Daily Beast: 1.4%Recency Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Vic Verbalaitis: 6.8%The Daily Beast: 5.1%Ad Hominem11.7%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.4%The Daily Beast: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.6%The Daily Beast: 3.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 4.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.5%The Daily Beast: 1.1%False Dilemma4.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 17.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 9.7%The Daily Beast: 6.4%Hasty Generalization17.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.0%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.8%Vic Verbalaitis: 6.4%The Daily Beast: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion16.8%This article: 8.8%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.6%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Begging the Question8.8%This article: 3.3%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.7%The Daily Beast: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.3%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.5%The Daily Beast: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.6%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.1%The Daily Beast: 1.4%Burden of Proof3.6%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.1%The Daily Beast: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.1%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.5%The Daily Beast: 3.8%Anecdotal13.1%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.2%The Daily Beast: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.8%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.7%The Daily Beast: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.8%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.7%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.1%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.7%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 6.1%Vic Verbalaitis: 2.1%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy6.1%This article: 4.9%Vic Verbalaitis: 1.4%The Daily Beast: 4.6%Unattributed Quote4.9%This article: 10.4%Vic Verbalaitis: 4.3%The Daily Beast: 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection10.4%This article: 10.6%Vic Verbalaitis: 23.3%The Daily Beast: 18.3%Biased Writer Voice10.6%This article: 1.6%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.3%The Daily Beast: 0.8%Indoctrination1.6%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 2.5%The Daily Beast: 3.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Vic Verbalaitis: 0.6%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Vic Verbalaitis: 2.3%The Daily Beast: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.7%

701 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers69%attributed speech214writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJoanna Coles • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageJoanna Coles • 34 words • 100.0% coverageJoanna Coles • 27 words • 100.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageJoanna Coles • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDavis Ingle • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 28 words • 100.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 11 words • 100.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 1 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Rothkopf • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Davis Ingle

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words8.8% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.4 ptsWriter: 16.4%Davis Ingle: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.9 ptsWriter: 8.9%Davis Ingle: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.