Author summary
87%4 analyzed articles/videos1,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vic Verbalaitis results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 1,697 hits. Analysis detected 9,694 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,953 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,126 of 6,392 authors). This Vic Verbalaitis is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Vic Verbalaitis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
67%Vic Verbalaitis (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,953
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510066.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 23.3%23.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 24.4%24.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 6.8%6.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 24.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate