Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joanna Coles results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 1,429 hits. Analysis detected 9,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,780 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,429 of 37,536 keywords). This Joanna Coles is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Joanna Coles
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
51%Joanna Coles (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510050.9% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate