Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Vaillancourt results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 1,208 hits . Analysis detected 9,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,876 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,537 of 6,628 authors). This William Vaillancourt is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group. William Vaillancourt
Author details
Total words: 7,876
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.2% 8.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.5% 6.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst