Iconic Singer’s Estate Warns Trump Never to Use His Song 58%

By William Vaillancourt0%

6/24/2026, 8:12:27 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 50.5% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 1,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 422 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (9,338 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the article peer group.

Leonard Cohen’s estate has objected to Donald Trump’s planned use of his song “Hallelujah” at the Freedom 250 rally in Washington. 
Trump, 80, said weeks ago that singers Lee Greenwood and Christopher Macchio would take the stage at the Great American State Fair, with Macchio singing the 1984 single, among other tunes. 
“The Leonard Cohen Estate has learned that the song ‘Hallelujah’ is to be performed at a Donald Trump rally on June 24,” says a Facebook post on Cohen’s account. 
“This use is not authorized, and the Estate does not support or approve of this or any similar usage. 
Thank you for your attention to this matter.” 
The White House did not immediately respond when asked about the statement from Cohen’s estate. 
The Canadian singer-songwriter died in November 2016 at age 82. 
Several musicians, like Martina McBride, The Commodores, Young MC, and Bret Michaels, pulled out of the event upon learning of its political nature, leaving Greenwood, Macchio, Flo Rida, Vanilla Ice, and Alexis Wilkins, the 27-year-old girlfriend of FBI Director Kash Patel, who insists she was invited “on my own accord.” 
Trump, his campaigns, and his administration have a long history of using music from artists—or their estates—who want nothing to do with him. 
In 2020, Tom Petty’s family issued a cease-and-desist order to the Trump campaign for playing “I Won’t Back Down” at a rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma. 
“Trump was in no way authorized to use this song to further a campaign that leaves too many Americans and common sense behind,” they said in a statement then. 
“Both the late Tom Petty and his family firmly stand against racism and discrimination of any kind. 
Tom Petty would never want a song of his used for a campaign of hate. 
He liked to bring people together.” 
That same year, Neil Young objected to Trump playing “Keep On Rockin In The Free World” at a July 4th event at Mount Rushmore. 
Last year, Sabrina Carpenter called out the administration for using one of her songs in an Immigration and Customs Enforcement video, writing, “This video is evil and disgusting. 
Do not ever involve me or my music to benefit your inhumane agenda.” 
And earlier this month, Ariana Grande wrote on a White House TikTok on immigration: “Please do not ever use my music ⁠in relation to this barbaric, inhumane, heinous nonsense.“ 
She added: “F--- ICE.” 
*Obsessed with pop culture and entertainment? 
Follow us on *Substack* and *YouTube* for even more coverage. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 4.6%The Daily Beast: 4.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%William Vaillancourt: 1.4%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Anchoring Bias7.3%This article: 17.3%William Vaillancourt: 6.6%The Daily Beast: 3.6%Availability Heuristic17.3%This article: 11.8%William Vaillancourt: 0.6%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic11.8%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.2%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 1.2%The Daily Beast: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.9%William Vaillancourt: 10.8%The Daily Beast: 11.2%Framing Effect15.9%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.6%The Daily Beast: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.6%The Daily Beast: 1.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%William Vaillancourt: 2.0%The Daily Beast: 1.3%Pessimism Bias5.5%This article: 30.3%William Vaillancourt: 15.3%The Daily Beast: 19.9%Negativity Bias30.3%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.6%The Daily Beast: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.4%The Daily Beast: 2.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 11.8%William Vaillancourt: 0.9%The Daily Beast: 1.3%In-Group Bias11.8%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.8%The Daily Beast: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%William Vaillancourt: 3.1%The Daily Beast: 1.3%Halo Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 1.4%The Daily Beast: 1.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%William Vaillancourt: 1.6%The Daily Beast: 1.4%Recency Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.1%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 2.3%The Daily Beast: 5.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.9%William Vaillancourt: 7.5%The Daily Beast: 3.2%Appeal to Authority6.9%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 2.1%The Daily Beast: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.6%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 17.3%William Vaillancourt: 8.4%The Daily Beast: 6.4%Hasty Generalization17.3%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 1.8%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 1.4%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 32.2%William Vaillancourt: 8.4%The Daily Beast: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion32.2%This article: 3.6%William Vaillancourt: 1.2%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Begging the Question3.6%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.9%The Daily Beast: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 4.9%The Daily Beast: 1.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.2%The Daily Beast: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 3.3%The Daily Beast: 3.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.2%The Daily Beast: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 2.5%The Daily Beast: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.2%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 50.5%William Vaillancourt: 8.2%The Daily Beast: 4.6%Unattributed Quote50.5%This article: 20.4%William Vaillancourt: 6.5%The Daily Beast: 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection20.4%This article: 2.4%William Vaillancourt: 9.5%The Daily Beast: 18.3%Biased Writer Voice2.4%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.5%The Daily Beast: 3.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%William Vaillancourt: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%William Vaillancourt: 0.7%The Daily Beast: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.8%

422 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.