Topic summary
73% 44 analyzed articles/videos 25,869 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Campaigns results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 21,381 hits . Analysis detected 183,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 176,338 analyzed words across 44 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,155 of 15,435 topics). This Political Campaigns is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group. Political Campaigns
Topic details
Total words: 176,338
Article count: 44
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score44 analyzed articles176.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst