Author summary
58% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francia Garcia Hernandez results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 943 hits . Analysis detected 6,972 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,681 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (4,985 of 6,199 authors). This Francia Garcia Hernandez is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Francia Garcia Hernandez
Author details
Total words: 9,681
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst