Publication summary
17% 33 analyzed articles/videos 19,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CT Mirror results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 7,792 hits . Analysis detected 76,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 107,276 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 21% (301 of 379 publications). This CT Mirror is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 107,276
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score33 analyzed articles107.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst