Author summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamie Flynn results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 333 hits . Analysis detected 2,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,725 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,255 of 6,196 authors). This Jamie Flynn is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Jamie Flynn
Author details
Total words: 1,725
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.8% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 15.4% 15.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.0% 16.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 19.3% 19.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.0%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 15.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Middle Ground: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst