Author summary
92% 1 analyzed article/video 488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keith Cagle results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , False Dilemma , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 219 hits . Analysis detected 1,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,752 of 6,427 authors). This Keith Cagle is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. Keith Cagle
Author details
Total words: 1,464
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.8% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 9.1% 9.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.7% 9.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 15.0% 15.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 15.0%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 9.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst