Author summary
ā 11% 1 analyzed article/video 888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Haddadin results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 160 hits . Analysis detected 1,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ā 29% (4,439 of 6,244 authors). This Jim Haddadin is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Jim Haddadin
Author details
Total words: 2,664
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst