Author summary
2% 2 analyzed articles/videos 408 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theo Peck-Suzuki results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 2.6% saturation with 281 hits . Analysis detected 1,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,880 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (6,316 of 6,326 authors). This Theo Peck-Suzuki is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Theo Peck-Suzuki
Author details
Total words: 10,880
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 0.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.7% Special Pleading: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst