Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mike Urgo results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 224 hits . Analysis detected 1,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,338 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Mike Urgo is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Mike Urgo
Author details
Total words: 1,338
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.7% 16.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 8.0% 8.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Loss Aversion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 2.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Composition/Division: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Tu Quoque: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst