Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mike Urgo results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 224 hits. Analysis detected 1,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,338 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Mike Urgo is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mike Urgo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Mike Urgo (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,338
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.7%16.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.4%6.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 8.0%8.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.2%6.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 12.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Composition/Division: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Tu Quoque: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos