Author summary
26% 1 analyzed article/video 1,672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Calista Oetama results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 252 hits . Analysis detected 2,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (5,520 of 6,316 authors). This Calista Oetama is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Calista Oetama
Author details
Total words: 5,016
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst