Author summary
60%7 analyzed articles/videos6,217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Frey results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 3,199 hits. Analysis detected 23,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,744 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,478 of 6,212 authors). This Kevin Frey is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Kevin Frey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
28%Kevin Frey (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 25,744
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510027.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles25.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.7%11.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate