Publication summary
24% 43 analyzed articles/videos 19,026 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mission Local results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 7,002 hits . Analysis detected 79,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 118,184 analyzed words across 43 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 17% (317 of 379 publications). This Mission Local is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 118,184
Article count: 43
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score43 analyzed articles118.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst