Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Rothkopf results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 616 hits. Analysis detected 4,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,969 of 37,536 keywords). This David Rothkopf is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
David Rothkopf
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
74%David Rothkopf (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.6%16.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.8%5.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos