Speaker summary
72% 21 analyzed articles/videos 1,298.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Davis Ingle results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 348.874 hits . Analysis detected 3,550.089 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,298.667 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (24,596 of 26,155 speakers). This Davis Ingle is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group. Davis Ingle
Speaker details
Total words: 1,298.667
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.0% percentile 7.3% BS Score21 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 16.8% 16.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 23.8% 23.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 15.2% 15.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 15.8% 15.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Tu Quoque: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.2% Special Pleading: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst