Author summary
41%3 analyzed articles/videos2,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Stevenson results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,641 hits. Analysis detected 9,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,343 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,655 of 6,262 authors). This Sam Stevenson is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Sam Stevenson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
26%Sam Stevenson (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,343
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

26% percentile
025507510025.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.3%13.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos