Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erkki Forster results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 1,314 hits. Analysis detected 5,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,144 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,454 of 6,628 authors). This Erkki Forster is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Erkki Forster
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
79%Erkki Forster (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,144
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

78% percentile
025507510078.1% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 31.7%31.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 24.9%24.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 24.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos