CNBC Anchor Shamelessly Fluffs Trump to His Face 67%

By Erkki Forster0%

7/2/2026, 12:52:41 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 52.7% saturation with 284 hits. Analysis detected 1,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 539 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (7,229 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the article peer group.

CNBC anchor Joe Kernen appeared desperate to please President Donald Trump during a fawning interview in the Oval Office. 
Kernen, 70, wasted no time repeating some of the president’s favorite boasts back to him as he sat down with Trump, 80, for an interview that aired Thursday. 
“Thank you for having me in this incredible place,” Kernen said, looking around the Oval Office,<b> </b>which Trump has routinely boasted about since stuffing it with gold decor. 
“It’s a nice place,” the president said with evident delight, taking in the Trumpified room himself. 
Kernen didn’t get far before fawning over another one of Trump’s obsessions. 
“I just want to start flying at about 40,000 feet, and just, what you’ve done and—pretty nice plane, lately,” the longtime <i>Squawk Box</i> host said with a smile, referring to the Qatari-gifted luxury Boeing 747 Trump began flying last week after having it upgraded on taxpayers’ dime to serve as Air Force One. 
Kernen led by mentioning “what’s amazing about this country,” but he interrupted himself to recite one of Trump’s favorite phrases back to him. 
“You always say, like, ‘Like never been seen before.’ 
There’s never been a country like this that’s ever been seen in the history of—” Kernen said before Trump cut him off. 
“Well, a lot of people don’t understand that right now we are in a golden age,” Trump said, before turning the praise back on Kernen. 
“You understand it very well—you cover it very well. 
At one point, Kernen told Trump, “I want you to succeed as president,” before gushing over his status as the richest person ever to live in the White House. 
“I want a businessman to run the country. 
And all along you entered as a billionaire businessman, which was unprecedented,” he said. 
“But no one’s ever been as wealthy as you. 
And you obviously know how to run a business, and that, I think, informs the way you run the country.” 
The praise appeared to serve as a prelude to a more pointed question, with Kernen continuing, “So I think we shouldn’t be surprised that your businesses are doing well. 
But how would you counter critics that say you’re using the presidency to enrich yourself and your family?” 
Trump deflected by ranting about the stock market’s record highs, and eventually said his sons run his business when Kernen pressed again. 
While ranting about electric cars, Trump appeared to unwittingly reveal that Kernen had brought his 24-year-old son to the Oval Office for the interview. 
“We’re not going to have an electric mandate where everybody has to have an electric car, where your beautiful son standing over there is mandated to have an electric car,” the president told Kernen. 
CNBC and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 
Trump was apparently so pleased with the interview that he told staff midway through the sit-down to give Kernen more time. 
“If he needs a little more time, just relax. 
I’m not Kamala,” Trump said, drawing laughter from Kernen. 
“Don’t be nervous, OK?” 
the president continued, before pointing at Kernen and saying, “He’s been my friend for a long time, and he’s a good man too.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.7%Erkki Forster: 2.8%The Daily Beast: 4.5%Confirmation Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 1.2%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Erkki Forster: 2.3%The Daily Beast: 3.6%Availability Heuristic4.5%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 1.4%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 5.0%The Daily Beast: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Erkki Forster: 4.0%The Daily Beast: 11.2%Framing Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Erkki Forster: 5.6%The Daily Beast: 1.2%Optimism Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 39.1%Erkki Forster: 24.9%The Daily Beast: 19.9%Negativity Bias39.1%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 6.7%The Daily Beast: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Erkki Forster: 1.2%The Daily Beast: 2.8%Fundamental Attribution Error9.3%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.9%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Erkki Forster: 1.4%The Daily Beast: 1.3%In-Group Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Erkki Forster: 2.3%The Daily Beast: 1.3%Halo Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.5%The Daily Beast: 1.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 1.8%The Daily Beast: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 12.6%Erkki Forster: 3.6%The Daily Beast: 5.1%Ad Hominem12.6%This article: 4.1%Erkki Forster: 0.5%The Daily Beast: 0.4%Straw Man4.1%This article: 5.2%Erkki Forster: 2.3%The Daily Beast: 3.2%Appeal to Authority5.2%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.2%Erkki Forster: 4.1%The Daily Beast: 6.4%Hasty Generalization5.2%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.8%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.6%Erkki Forster: 4.4%The Daily Beast: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion10.6%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.4%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.5%Erkki Forster: 1.3%The Daily Beast: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.5%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 1.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 1.4%The Daily Beast: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.8%Erkki Forster: 2.7%The Daily Beast: 3.8%Anecdotal9.8%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 1.6%The Daily Beast: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.5%Erkki Forster: 5.4%The Daily Beast: 4.6%Unattributed Quote3.5%This article: 5.2%Erkki Forster: 0.9%The Daily Beast: 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection5.2%This article: 52.7%Erkki Forster: 31.7%The Daily Beast: 18.3%Biased Writer Voice52.7%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 9.8%Erkki Forster: 6.4%The Daily Beast: 3.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erkki Forster: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

539 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers45%attributed speech298writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Kernen • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Kernen • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Kernen • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 25 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Kernen • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Kernen • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Kernen • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Kernen • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Kernen • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

73%flagged-word coverage
113 attributed words47% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-95.3 ptsWriter: 95.3%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-17.8 ptsWriter: 17.8%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-6.4 ptsWriter: 6.4%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.